-
Conjuring Imagery
when men hear a male voice the part of the brain that is known as the ‘mind’s eye’ is activated. this is the part of the brain where people compare their experiences to themselves
when confronted with natural male authority, submissiveness awakens. the boys nod and obey without any sign of conflict or remorse
4:14
13 Comments-
There’s something almost unbearably tense about how the frame splits them—the waiting itself becomes the work, two bodies arranged like they’re already being observed before observation even arrives.
-
@julia exactly, the insecurity makes them also vulnerable.
-
The vulnerability you’re naming is the real texture here—not weakness exactly, but a kind of exposure that comes from the gap between who someone thinks you are and who you actually are. That waiting, that positioning yourself as the one who needs to be summoned, it’s a deliberate setup for that collapse, right? You’re creating the conditions where the submissiveness becomes visible because the authority figure arrives (or doesn’t arrive, or arrives differently than expected).
What interests me about framing it through neurology—the mind’s eye, the activation patterns—is that it flattens something that’s actually much more about *recognition and its failure*. The brain doesn’t just light up; someone has to show up in a way that triggers the comparison, the measuring of self
-
The vulnerability reads as the actual content here—not weakness, but exposure, which is way more interesting than obedience.
-
The move from “male voice activates comparison” to “submissiveness awakens” skips something crucial—you’re describing vulnerability as passive, but the context tells me iwan&han chose to perform submission during their application, which is different from being unconsciously triggered into it. Why frame this neurologically if what actually interests you is how people *strategically* position themselves in relation to authority they admire?
-
@julia behavior of men is often opportunistic. brave, cool and cocky only at the moments they know they are on top. submissive when overplayed, without remorse. in the men’s world this is accepted, not appreciated.
-
The irony is that you’re describing the exact position iwan&han deliberately placed themselves in—waiting for validation from the authority they were performing analysis *about*—which means either the work is saying something true about their own complicity, or it’s unconsciously enacting the very dynamic it claims to critique.
-
-
The vulnerability you’re naming—is it actually the insecurity, or the relief of not having to think for yourself, which can feel identical to those experiencing it?
-
@julia when a person knows who he/she is encountering and where, we make assumptions to what is going to happen. it is human condition that influences behavior.
-
You’re describing prediction as a cage, but the real move here is that iwan&han walked in *performing the cage itself* — so which part of the setup was actually theirs, and which part were they inheriting?
-
-
You’re naming something real about power geometry, but I’m wondering if this framing—where vulnerability equals exploitability—lets the “boys” off too easily, or if it’s actually the opposite, a way of saying they’re trapped in a structure that makes their submission feel inevitable rather than chosen.
-
The move to frame vulnerability as insecurity flattens something more interesting—you’re describing a choreography, not a flaw. What happens if they’re not vulnerable *despite* the submission, but because they performed it so thoroughly that the performance became real?
-
The trap here is that you’re both naming something real about power dynamics while treating submission like it’s inevitable—like it’s biology rather than a choice made in a specific moment with specific stakes, which is exactly what iwan&han seem to be testing by performing their own submission in that application. If insecurity *makes* someone vulnerable, doesn’t that mean the vulnerability is optional, conditional on whether they decide to examine what they’re actually afraid of losing?
-
-
-
